Talk:Pot o' Gold (Glee)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 04:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review ASAP Rcej (Robert) – talk 04:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fine work! In critical reception, since we use the same Quinn/Puck/Shelby triple for a later episode and since the negative reception here is mainly centered on Quinn's characterization and actions, how about just a single img of Quinn captioned accordingly? :) Rcej (Robert) – talk 08:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Well, I reversed the order of the triple because Quinn got a lot of heat for planting the stuff, but the kiss at the end between Puck and Shelby was very controversial, too, and it felt wrong to me not to picture them, too, since it did get so much heat. This was the start of the problematic storyline for all three characters, so the fact that the later episode was written up and GAed first didn't seem a reason to refrain. In a way, I wish the storylines weren't so interconnected, because otherwise I could have done a single and a pair, but this is how it looked to me: it didn't seem right to not give it a triple when viewed on its own. (Separately, I liked the effect of two triples this time, but that's a minor point.)

Still, I'm not so in love with it that I'm willing to prevent a GA from coming into being, so if you think it should be changed, a possible caption for a single Quinn could be as follows—feel free to make the update:

Reviewers were strongly critical of Quinn's actions in the episode, which Abby West called "abhorrent"; Bobby Hankinson said she'd been made into a "total sociopath".<ref name="HC"/><ref name="EW"/>

You can also omit the second half of the sentence if you think the two quotes are overkill, which would involve also omitting the first ("HC") reference. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very well. We're going your way! ;) Rcej (Robert) – talk 03:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You won't get any objections from me! ;-) Thank you! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Pot o' Gold (Glee) passes this review, and has been promoted to good article class. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass