Talk:Power Matters Alliance

Potential NPOV or SOAP problems?

The section "The Problem" on this article sounds like a piece of advertising from their website. Basically, it's indicating that one should think of power outlets as more of a problem.  —Airhogs777 TC WS 21:57, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, this article is full of shit. Like PMA is all for the consumer and this page just advertises for them. Here's the real backstory: http://www.wpcentral.com/att-removed-qi-lumia-1520-make-room-pma

- Anonymous

Yeah, I keep finding quite a few un-cited points in the article that don't have very clear sources.It's better than it was before, but a lot of this info seems like stuff taken from a PMA press release. It definitely needs some sort of overhaul. Khifler (talk) 23:50, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion: Separate PMA organization from PMA wireless charging standard

Currently, this article includes information about both the organization and the standard, and it often jumps between the two of them during the course of it. I suggest we make a new page for the wireless charging standard and allow that page to cover the specifics of the standard.

--Khifler (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

The exact same topic came up in the article for Qi, there decision [1] was the opposite. Since this is a longer article it may be worth doing so, but both articles are rather lacking right now (PMA article has no details on the technology; Qi has almost nothing on the governing organization). Right now I'm rather more curious whether Qi is going to win absolutely or simply all devices will end up implementing both. 207.172.210.101 (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Update: This organization no longer exists

It was merged with WiPower to form AirFuel Alliance, and PMA is now referred to as "AirFuel Inductive". ViperSnake151  Talk  19:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

References