Talk:Power usage effectiveness

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Early comment[edit]

I propose

change from "measure" to "ratio indicating" perhaps a little pendent, nonetheless a more accurate way.
adding a scale to indicate the current range of ratios of PUE

--Seanwong (talk) 05:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Referrer instead of separate article[edit]

This information is adequately covered in the "data center" article (<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datacenter#Energy_efficiency>). There should be a referral to that article instead of a separate article here with the shortcomings already noted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.84.43.2 (talk) 13:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well there are too many stubby articles still. I would proposal a compromise, at least merge of Data center infrastructure efficiency for example. This one is perhaps a bit more complete so would off-hand suggest this direction. On the other hand, generally it is more natural to have metrics where bigger numbers indicate "better" values. Any comments? W Nowicki (talk) 17:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]