Talk:Pratt & Whitney Canada PW600

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Picture caption[edit]

The picture that purports to show a 615 on an Eclipse 500 presumably shows a 610 in actuality . . . .

109.145.107.64 (talk) 07:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers[edit]

References in the articles on the aircraft powered by the PW600 series suggest that the number of engines delivered exceeds 2000

109.145.107.64 (talk) 08:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New version of PW617[edit]

This, the 617F1-E, has 1730 lbs thrust:

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/ebace-embraer-wins-easa-approval-for-phenom-100ev-e-437431/

86.164.154.73 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PW615 orphaned[edit]

The Eclipse 400 never did get off the ground, and the Cessna Citation Mustang ceased production in May 2017

86.148.154.56 (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So what? - BilCat (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, apart from any other consideration, such as, to take an example not entirely at random, AGF, the article is out-of-date.

I was going to update it when I had an opportunity to copy links from elsewhere, but, do you know what, I don't think I'll bother.

86.148.154.56 (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am assuming good faith, but I didn't understand what you expect to be done. Your comments were vague about that. Also, you haven't provided any sources for your information, forcing others to hunt for a source if they were going to update it. - BilCat (talk) 19:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]