Talk:Pre-engineered building

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Any reference available to validate the 30% weight savings over conventional? Extraordinary Spaces (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Lighter weight equates to less steel ...." is a chicken and egg statement. Also, lower weight does not necessarily equate to less cost as implied. I can easily design a complex geometry that optimizes material but is expensive to manufacture. Some manufacturing design software does not optimize for manufactured cost as overtly as for minimized steel weight. I think that the writer may have more ideas to communicate that they have not fully developed in the statement.Extraordinary Spaces (talk) 03:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pre Engineered buildings are the alternate solution for conventional RCC buildings in industrial applications. It has lot of advantages like, faster construction, easy design, comparitively less cost etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagathnivasan (talkcontribs) 13:36, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Supplier details[edit]

http://www.interarchbuildings.com/pre-engineered-metal-buildings.asp

[http://www.bajajngp.com/pre-engineered-metal-buildings manufacturer

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yndesai (talkcontribs) 5 January 2015 (UTC)