Talk:Preise, Jerusalem, den Herrn, BWV 119/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Smerus (talk · contribs) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well written[edit]

Overall absolutely acceptable. Two quibbles which I would raise:

History and words - 'Bach could count on the entire council (his employer) listening, and likely also civil servants' - 'probably' is better than 'likely' in colloquial English.
Scoring and structure - I suggest adding 'the musicologist' or 'the editor' before 'Alfred Durr' so that it is clear where this is coming from.

Verifiable with no original research[edit]

Well sourced and cited as one would expect from this editor.

Broad in its coverage, Neutral[edit]

Exemplary on both counts and well-focussed.

Stable[edit]

No problems

Images[edit]

Appropriate images and clear tables

Summary[edit]

I have no problems in passing this for GA, but the editor might like to take a look at the two quibbles under "Well-written".--Smerus (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, done, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, super article.--Smerus (talk) 11:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]