Talk:Prince-Bishopric of Strasbourg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Is there any particular reason the title is "Archbishopric" of Strasbourg rather than the more common English title "Archdiocese" of Strasbourg? While technically either term is correct, the former is extremely rarely used.--Dcheney 11:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question. We have several page titles with "Archbishopric of..." or "Bishopric of...". I believe "bishopric" is used mainly in historical texts... There should probably be a Wikipedia naming convention on this. Chl 23:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still pretty new to Wiki - how does one go about establishing a naming convention?--Dcheney 11:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You'd discuss it at WP:NC. One should probably look at all the articles in questions, and carefully consider all the alternatives. The German dioceses especially are in a mess right now. Chl 20:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh, another split. Benkenobi18 (talk) 07:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prince-Bishopric of Strasbourg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]