Talk:Prince Family Paper/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall this is a good article, though I do have a couple nitpicks:

The two sentences on Darwinism (in the lead and body, repsectively) sound virtually identical and therefore repetitive; reword one to mix it up a bit.
- I changed it up a bit, but let me know if you think it needs to be more clear. — Hun ter Ka hn 02:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"They didn’t let Michael off the hook. Instead the writers took a dark and dirty turn toward the truly tragic, in the literal sense of the word." <- I'm nitpicky on quotes having cites at the end of the respective sentence, even though I'm positive it uses the same ref as the next sentence. Same with a couple others.
- I think I got them all, but if I missed any let me know. — Hun ter Ka hn 02:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is all I have though. I'll put it on hold and pass it when it's fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, article passes. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]