Talk:Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reviews[edit]

Nitendo Power gave the Wii version an 8.0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.220.69.38 (talk) 21:16, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Status as Sequel, Interquel, or Prequel[edit]

I think the game would have to be an interquel as it does take place in the time line The Prince remembers. I don't see how it can be considered a sequel just because the original time line was changed. At the end of Two Thrones The Prince becomes King as his father is dead thus it could not take place after Two Thrones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Van Redd (talkcontribs) 06:32, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A minor error[edit]

Just to quickly notify editors of a minor error in the article. "With Ubisoft's feature Uplay, players may unlock Ezio, the main character from Assassin's Creed II." The statement is incorrect - players may unlock Ezio's costume with the Uplay platform, though the actual character model remains in the Prince's likeness, but does not become Ezio's likeness. The unlock is listed on Uplay as "Ezio Costume" and the description is "Play in Ezio's costume from Assassin's Creed II. Check the Extras menu to activate this costume". [1] [2] unsigned comment added by Kidnplay (talkcontribs) 06:32, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ The Uplay platform on Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands (PlayStation 3)
  2. ^ Personal experience of both The Forgotten Sands and Assassin's Creed II, both via extensive press review process

Door Bug[edit]

I don't own this game, but apparently it has or had a door bug, where in hard mode a certain door doesn't open. this YouTube video has over 100 people thumbs upping "Thumbs up if that son of a bitch door bug brang you here!" and pretty much all the other comments to the video appear to be about it. I searched this Wikipedia article for "bug" and "door" and got no matches. Maybe information about the door bug should be added to it, it's quite a big deal if a game like this has a major bug like that. --82.171.70.54 (talk) 02:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, bugs aren't notable unless commented on by a reliable source. Also, I think the door bug might be caused by a pirated version, but that might be my mistake. Thanks! Fin© 08:12, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Myeah... Here's what you could've also written: "Yep, but only if commented on by reliable source(s)." Is there a reliable source? Probably. I get many hits via Google, but I don't feel like looking through them and figuring out what could be used. ;) (see the Google suggestions when typing "Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands door" ...) --82.171.70.54 (talk) 23:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is no 'door bug'. What people experience is related to Ubisoft DRM. The game offloads certain parts of the game to a server, the game requests those things at runtime; these parts can be anything that the developer wants. In this game it's levers logic, door timing, and so on. People that think they ran into a 'door bug' used a(n incomplete) crack. There is no 'door bug'. --82.170.113.123 (talk) 12:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]