Talk:Privacy in Australian law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Privacy in Australian law is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Notable example[edit]

trying to find a good source article but a good example of this law and its position in regards to australian rights would be the Sony vs Australa copyright lawsuit. the basics of it are: Sony tried to force australia ISP's to give out the names of owners of certain IP's known to be pirating material from Sony industries. after the ISP providers refused they took it to the high court of australia. Sony ended up loosing as the Austrlian law puts the right of privacy as a higher right than copyright protection.

whats people opinions, good example/precedence for this law or just un needed fluff material?152.91.9.153 (talk) 22:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not fluff, a good example, depending on which section you insert it into. SurveyorMJF (talk) 19:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]