Talk:Privileged (TV series)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Privileged (TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright issues[edit]

The text of the section "Pilot" is directly copied from the website given as a reference, which sources it to a CW press release. Presumably a press release is copyright (unless there's some exception I'm not aware of), which would make this text unsuitable for Wikipedia. VoluntarySlave (talk) 22:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not positive, but I think that it constitutes fair use as press releases are intended for review by the public at large.--Mclauss (talk) 03:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Nielsen ratings[edit]

There are currently three tables with the following ratings: Fast National Ratings - Final Weekly Ratings - DVR Ratings

To me that seems a bit unnecessary, I think the Final Weekly Ratings are sufficient. If you compare it to wikis of other tv-shows, they mostly only have 1 table. This just looks like a filler. - Desolato (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The source for the DVR ratings isn't being added by the user(s) that is adding them, so I guess that will be going away eventually. The Fast National and Final Weekly Ratings incorporate different data. I think it's worth keeping them both but perhaps collapsing the fast national ratings using a collapsible table?--Mclauss (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See an example here of using a collapsible table to collapse the fast national ratings.--Mclauss (talk) 16:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]