Talk:Project Gasbuggy

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Low-importance).

Coordinate error[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

This location is reported as 36.677962, -107.207964 from this source: Center for Land Use Interpretation. http://clui.org/ludb/site-mapped/9/7329

The Google Map location does not look to be correct, as it's on a wooded ridge, away from any roads. The location indicated on the Center for Land Use Interpretation map appears to fit the description.

—— Preceding unsigned comment added by TreeDoctor (talk • contribs)

I looked at the google map for that location, and if memory serves, it's vaguely familiar. That's probably it. Chubbles (talk) 00:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The location marked on the CLUI page is confirmed by other online sources, so I've emended the coordinates accordingly. Deor (talk) 01:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Second plaque?[edit]

The article states that there is a second plaque warning against potential exploitation of the site without permission of the Federal Government; however the picture of the plaque in the article contains exactly the information indicated in its second paragraph. This leads me to believe that either 1) the pictured plaque had subsequently been replaced by two later ones or 2) there is only the one plaque, containing the pertinent information in two separate paragraphs. The second explanation makes far more logical sense to me, but as I have never personally visited the site, I would love this to be documented rather than just unilaterally editing the article. 2600:1004:B10D:9D01:7DE8:C7C6:825F:5AEF (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]