Talk:Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Protocol signing date[edit]

It says in this article that the Protocol is signed on 13 Jan. 1967, but I think it should be 31 Jan. 1967. Source: http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html on page 52, footnote 4. Cheers! (And sorry if I don't write this in the way it is supposed to be written according to Wikipedia standards.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.50.222.241 (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: additional source[edit]

Second source: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=V-5&chapter=5&lang=en — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.50.222.241 (talk) 08:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are all parties sovereign?[edit]

@L.tak: Regarding [1]: It's unclear to me that all the parties to the treaty are sovereign states. [2] lists Netherlands as a party, but Wikipedia says that Netherlands is not sovereign; Kingdom of the Netherlands is. It's clear the list is not referring to the Kingdom of the Netherlands because the treaty is not in effect in parts of the Kingdom outside of Netherlands, like Curaçao. Have you seen other sources which say differently? -- Beland (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the Netherlands can mean two things: a shortcut for the Kingdom of the Netherlands or its constituent country ("land") called Netherlands as well (see refs there). For all treaty actions it's the treaty as a subject of international law that ratifies on behalf of the Netherlands, Curacao, Sint Maarten or Aruba. It's website is a bit more precise regarding this treaty (here); see also the introduction regarding the Netherlands here. I hope that helps! If you need more sources, let me know! L.tak (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, fun. -- Beland (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Protocol_Relating_to_the_Status_of_Refugees&oldid=1209887856"