A fact from Psoralidium tenuiflorum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the root of the slimflower scurfpea can be eaten raw or cooked, or ground up and used as an ingredient in bread-making?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
... that the root of the slimflower scurfpea can be eaten raw or cooked, or ground up and used as an ingredient in bread-making? Source: "Root - raw or cooked. It can also be dried, ground into a powder and used in soups or with cereals for making bread etc."
ALT1:... that the root of the slimflower scurfpea can be eaten raw or cooked, or ground up to make bread?
This is actually a poisonous plant, and inedible -the sources are bad![edit]
Lucky the thin woody taproot is also impossible to harvest, and so distasteful poisonings are rare -but poisoning by this plant causes a disease in sheep where they ram their head into a wall until they die. Don't believe Wikipedia! 86.83.56.115 (talk) 19:52, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can you cite a reliable source for this information? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I can! Here's another ref, and another. As far as I can tell, what has happened is that the old common name was Indian turnip, and that caused George Usher, the author of the 1974 work A Dictionary of Plants Used by Man, to be confused with the species Psoralea esculenta (which it resembles). He appears to be the first to claim it can be eaten. Let me see if I can find a copy, if Usher also claims it has succulent tubers (which looks likely), he's clearly mistaken. This species is differentiated from its congeners by being the only Psoralidium with a rootstock which goes vertically down, instead of growing horizontally. No Psoralidium species have tubers. Cwmhiraeth, do you know Dr. Duke's Database? If there is no mention of a US plant being eaten in this database, it's a reason to be suspicious. 86.83.56.115 (talk) 21:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, oldest source is H. D. Harrington, Edible Native Plants of the Rocky Mountains, 1967, who claims it was consumed dried and pounded by the Kiowa. I have a good book about this group, see if I can corroborate him... 86.83.56.115 (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]