Talk:Psychedelic microdosing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JJD77.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Science Communication[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2022 and 4 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JonStark22 (article contribs).

Combination in microdosing[edit]

Hi @Bon courage, I don't understand why you reverted my edit, commenting "Rv. weak primary source not supporting claim".

The first source is a survey of 4,050 microdosers: "The ranking of the most popular type of stacking was the same for psilocybin and LSD, with addition of Lion’s Mane mushroom reported by 39% of microdosers (n = 1575), niacin (18%, n = 727), and chocolate (5%, n = 217). Additionally, 16% of microdosers reported the combination of Lion’s Mane and niacin (n = 662)."

The second one, also cited in the above article, is Stamets, P. Psilocybin Mushrooms and the Mycology of Consciousness (Invited talk at Psychedelic Science, 2017: "Chocolate and cacao remain popular additions to psilocybin, whereas as adding Syrian rue (Peganum harmala), Lion’s Mane mushrooms (Hericium erinaceus) and/or niacin appear to be more recent phenomena"

Why do you say that these sources do not support the claim that "Psilocybin microdosers often combine psilocybin with other substances such as Hericium erinaceus (HE) and Niacin"? A455bcd9 (talk) 13:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a primary source in a weak journal, so not suitable for use; and a survey of self-appointed microdosing English-speaking iPhone users is not generalizable to a universal assertion. The second source is worse. Wikipedia is meant to reflecting accepted knowledge to really we need strong secondary sources here. Bon courage (talk) 14:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. A455bcd9 (talk) 14:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]