Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Some duplinks according to the tool.
The only ones I see are in image captions, which is considered acceptable (once in text, once in caption).
"Scholars including psychoanalysts have" Commas
Added.
"stories of" Maybe "about" instead?
Done.
"Guide figures" Why the capital G?
Removed.
"On Klein's theory" and "On Vygotsky's theory" isn't "in xyz's theory" a more common construction?
Done.
"Gollum as Devouring Mother" This was mentioned in the table earlier, but you could add a gloss explaining it here as well.
Glossed.
The images are all licensed and used correctly.
Noted.
The references are all reliable and formatted correctly.
Spotchecks:
Flieger, Verlyn (1996). "Tolkien's Experiment with Time: The Lost Road, The Notion Club Papersand J.W. Dunne". Mythlore. Verifies all claims made.
Matthews, Dorothy (1975). "The Psychological Journey of Bilbo Baggins". In Lobdell, Jared (ed.). A Tolkien Compass. Verifies all claims made.
Harl, Allison (2007). "The monstrosity of the gaze: critical problems with a film adaptation of The Lord of the Rings". Mythlore. Verifies all claims made.
Grant, Patrick (1973). "Tolkien: Archetype and Word". Cross Currents (Winter 1973). Verifies all claims made.
Noted.
Nice article, but I am starting to think that psychoanalysts have entirely too much time on their hands. AryKun (talk) 14:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keeps them from doing anything worse! Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, will be passing. AryKun (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]