Talk:Public security bureau (China)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Public security bureau (China) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Scarce and slanted article[edit]

The public security bureau is also accountable for Internet monitoring issues. The article is very short, of course, but furthermore it should include the more morally dubious sides of the public security bureau. I don't know where to get sources for it, but here's one that tells at least something from another perspective.

http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/15-11/ff_chinafirewall?currentPage=all —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.8.14.28 (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Morally dubious? It's a police force for god's sake, of course it does "morally dubious" things like enforcing government orders. I don't see what the big fuss is about. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 09:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something as large and with such a history as the PSB should have a much more informative article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.33.169.217 (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should its name be capitalised? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe so RightQuark (talk) 01:48, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 May 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move to Public security bureau (China). No prejudice against moves to other titles due to low participation in this discussion. (non-admin closure) f e minist 15:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese public security bureau → Chinese Public Security Bureau – Incorrect capitalization of the agency. Lunaticar (talk) 04:45, 14 May 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. SkyWarrior 14:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Public security bureaux in China The purpose of lowercase here seems to be to imply that there are multiple. "Chinese Public Security Bureau" sounds like a single bureau, but this article is about public security bureaux in China generally. An article about police stations in the UK would better be called "Police stations in the UK" rather than "British Police Station", wouldn't you say? —A L T E R C A R I ✍ 15:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Public security bureau (China). This is a generic term not a proper name and this is our usual format for such terms. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Public security bureau (China). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100522114840/http://www.gdga.gov.cn/en/index.htm to http://www.gdga.gov.cn/en/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 05:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– I closed the previous RM discussion three years ago, but I feel like this article is the WP:PTOPIC for "Public security bureau". Page views indicate that this article receives over half the visits for articles under this name; note that this article about public security bureaus in China serves as a WP:CONCEPTDAB for Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau, which is about the specific public security bureau in the city of Beijing. Also, web search results for "public security bureau" are mostly about China. feminist (talk) 04:12, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose 公安局 is yes. But they exist outside China. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.