Talk:Pueblo pottery

A fact from Pueblo pottery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Pueblo pottery (example pictured) has been created by Pueblo people and their antecedents in the Southwestern United States and Northern Mexico for almost two thousand years?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pueblo pottery.

Wikipedia

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

United States: New Mexico

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Low-importance).

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Mimbres fish pot, c. 1000–1150 AD

... that Pueblo pottery (example pictured) has been created by Pueblo people and their antecedents in the Southwestern United States and Northern Mexico for almost two thousand years? Source: several

Reviewed: ~~to come~~
Comment: User's second article for DYK - the first is on the Main page right now - I'm just the nominator. The source is a book.

Created by Netherzone (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 16:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

The article is long enough and new enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. The hook is directly cited and the image is free use. The information about the list of pueblos, underneath the Current Era section, needs to be referenced. A QPQ is needed. Gerda Arendt SL93 (talk) 20:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review. I reviewed now Template:Did you know nominations/Cécile Nobrega. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is interesting enough. I would like to see the banner at Pueblo_pottery#Contemporary_period removed during the time that it is featured on the main page.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 04:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Epiphyllumlover, thank you for your suggestion, the banner has been removed, and am now satisfied with the section. Thank you Gerda Arendt for the nomination. Netherzone (talk) 16:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the unreferenced list of pueblos from the Current Era of the article. Everything is referenced now. Netherzone (talk) 14:04, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is long enough and new enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. The hook is directly cited. The image is free use. A QPQ has been completed. SL93 (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-GA comments[edit]

I haven't forgotten about this, though I'm getting busy this week so it may be in the weekend when I'm able to look up this. I hope that's alright. Best - Aza24 (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, there's no deadline! I've expanded the Lead section, as well as removed some of the photos, as another editor had suggested those changes. Netherzone (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from JM[edit]

I have a spare few minutes, so I'm going to finally start looking at this article as I promised. Thanks for your patience!

The first sentence is a little too long. I advise splitting off the "two thousand years" claim into a separate sentence. The second sentence, meanwhile doesn't sound very neutral (and is it missing an apostrophe?).
There seems to be some inconsistency between your use of Pueblo and pueblo. Perhaps your usage is consistent and I'm missing the rule, but it may be worth taking a close look at!
Where do these "periods" come from? Who splits up the history of the craft in this way? Also, I note that we have 700 years of history that are pre era 1!

Stopping there -- sorry, I said I only had a few minutes... Josh Milburn (talk) 15:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

J Milburn,

Done I think! Thanks so much for your feedback and help. If you are interested, and have another minute or so - no hurry at all - I'd love to hear other suggestions if you don't mind. If you are too busy I understand.

Made changes per bullet point #1. I tried to fix the Pueblo vs pueblo issue, using Pueblo only when it was part of a proper name, such as the actual name of a Pueblo (as in San Ildefonso Pueblo) or when it referred to the Puebloan people.

The 700 prior years you mention in the 3rd bullet point is the "Basketmaker" eras. I've modified the article so that missing pre-Pueblo period is no longer a lacuna. Basically, these peoples made pottery by packing clay around baskets and firing them so the baskets were gone and all that remained was the ceramic vessel. Ingenious but not really relevant to this article. BTW the periods are called the Pecos Classification, I've added that to the article. Netherzone (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Aza24[edit]

Apologies, I really have no excuse for getting to this so late, other than general forgetfulness :)

You're a bit inconsistent with CE, BCE vs AD, BC—either is fine, it should just be consistent.

Done

Also, for date ranges we use en dashes – not hyphens -

Done

another issue throughout, I don't really know the actual "rule" on this, but most reviewers will expect page numbers or ranges to be given for each citation. Otherwise the effectiveness of WP:V is greatly diminished
With just having read the lead, I think it needs to give a little more context for what time period we're talking about. When are the oldest examples of pueblo pottery from? Maybe it's worth mentioning the five periods I see later, especially if they're such an important division in the history of pueblo pottery. "For centuries" and "During modern times" are too vague!
"serving the needs of daily life" may be redundant as you just said they're for "ceremonial and utilitarian usage"

Done

I'm not sure that the link to Cochiti Pueblo helps, the sentence makes it sound like Cochiti Pueblo is a being of some sort, but the article is on a place; is there a better link or section of the article it could link to?

Done

See WP:LEADCITE; though not required, it's de facto practice that I'd certainly recommend. The idea of having no citations in the lead is that the leads sums up the rest of the article so nicely that everything should be sourced below. If you take a look at current articles at FAC (and indeed most GAs) you'll see very few—and more likely no—refs in the lead.
I love the gallery in the methods section; for here I wonder if more information on current/more modern methods can be included. And if the methods have stayed the same, that should certainly be said out right here.
(in the beginning of the history section) Perhaps give some general context for when the first pueblo people are known to have lived; I'm also kind of wondering if there were other forms of art known before the time of pottery—obviously not much needs to be written for these two things though
Will get to some more later today.... Aza24 (talk) 02:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I do wonder if anything can be said in the history section about the pottery from AD 200—750
Any link for Chuska? Aza24 (talk) 01:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]