Talk:Pukatja, South Australia

Australia: Places / South Australia / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Pukatja, South Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pukatja, South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest split for Ernabella Arts[edit]

Ernabella Arts is an well-known centre for artists of world renown, and quite a bit of history could be filled in in a new article. Suggest split on grounds of importance. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Supported Cowdy001 (talk) 07:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Supported but with the proviso that a bit more work is done so that it is more than a stub. There does seem to be more avialable on line to do this without too much difficulty. Aoziwe (talk) 10:13, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to create Ernabella Arts and make more than just a stub of it. I am part of the #knowmyname project. Is it OK to just transfer the paragraph relating to Ernabella arts and use that for the new page?MaryannM53 (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes MaryannM53, you can create Ernabella Arts by initially copying everything over with an edit summary like this: "creating article on Ernabella Arts by copying information from Pukatja, South Australia.", this would ensure that there is a link to the edit history (you could also add a section in its talkpage saying the same thing). ps. i also support this split of a wikinotable organisation. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]