Talk:Puncheon Run Connector

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePuncheon Run Connector has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 24, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Puncheon Run Connector/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 04:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • What is a surface intersection?
  • "development" - either be more specific, or remove it entirely.
  • What does DelDOT stand for?
  • What about the city of Dover not liking the proposal? That seems significant, doesn't it?
  • Not a requirement for GA, but the picture is a bit dark.

On hold. --Rschen7754 05:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Passing. --Rschen7754 20:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Puncheon Run Connector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]