Talk:Put–call parity

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Revert edits by User:Gerhard Schroeder[edit]

I am reverting, for now, your edits because they seem to be largely based on your own scholarly work. Since these claims are somewhat out of the mainstream (use of Black-Scholes and related volatility-based pricing models are in fact extremely common in the financial markets), you should let someone else interpret your work and incorporate your findings into this page. Ronnotel 14:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equivalence[edit]

User:151.202.156.78 - I reverted your change because I think you may have not understood the derivation. Assume the delta on the IBM_Feb07_100.0_Call is 0.4. That means you must sell 40 shares of IBM to become delta neutral. Conversely, the IBM_Feb07_100.0_Put has a delta of -0.6 and you must buy 60 shares of IBM. Thus, you either sell $d$ shares when you have the call or buy $-d$ shares when you have the put. Have a look at delta neutral Ronnotel 22:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]