This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Is there a need for this bit of ownership history of the Priory? He is not given as a noted resident. SovalValtos (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 4 external links on Puttenham, Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
This section is about 60 years out of date, STD was introduced in 1958. I would suggest deleting it. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The section could do with source(s) but surely we should not just be concerned with recentism?SovalValtos (talk)
Not sure where to find sources now! Even if kept, it is too detailed. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed excess and poorly written detail on number changes.SovalValtos (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The exchange is apparently due for demolition to be replaced by private housing. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SovalValtos From the planning survey: "There are two single storey buildings with pitched roofs situated off the B3000. They can be seen from a large pub car park off the main road. The buildings are reached from along a track, which is planted with maturing native vegetation. Paddocks are situated opposite the application site and the site is relatively open in character." The pub is the Jolly Farmer. Grid reference for the exchange is SU 93576 47800. Access is off a lane signposted to the recycling facilty. Regards Murgatroyd49 (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Murgatroyd49 that should be enough for me to find it if I visit. I later found a Google Earth street view showing a sign for the exchange but not an actual view of the building. Would you be able to use one of the planning docs as a source?SovalValtos (talk) 17:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't they a primary source? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have put an image on commons Murgatroyd49 which if you think is worth adding to the article, please do so. I took some more detailed exterior views but did not have access to the interior.SovalValtos (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SovalValtos Thanks for doing that I'll take a look at have a go at rewriting the section. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Here is a link to the image Puttenham Telephone ExchangeSovalValtos (talk) 20:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
