Talk:Pycnogonum litorale
 | A fact from Pycnogonum litorale appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Did you know nomination[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Metridium dianthus
- ... that the sea anemone Metridium dianthus is parasitised by the sea spider Pycnogonum litorale?
- Reviewed: Team San Juan
- Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Charles K. Prioleau
Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC).
Interesting fact about these two creatures, both on few but fine sources, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and great! One minor thing: I thought that the hook fact has to be in both articles. If that is wrong, ignore me, and if right, please add it to the anemone until DYK is over. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't think it is a requirement that the hook fact should be in both articles in a two-article hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: I don't see a firm rule on this? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't either. There are altogether too many rules, and this has been discussed and permitted in the past. Let's ask @BlueMoonset:. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- The hook facts need to be in at least one of the articles of a multi-article hook, but doesn't need to be in all of them. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Works for me! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 20:19, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- The hook facts need to be in at least one of the articles of a multi-article hook, but doesn't need to be in all of them. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:22, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't either. There are altogether too many rules, and this has been discussed and permitted in the past. Let's ask @BlueMoonset:. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: I don't see a firm rule on this? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't think it is a requirement that the hook fact should be in both articles in a two-article hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P5 without image