Talk:Quad chart
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
More on the way[edit]
Currently, the article is basically a stub. As I continue with this, I will add more sources, especially for the claim that many agencies require or recommend quad charts in bidding. This is taken for granted by industry and subject matter experts but obviously needs more citation for readers who may not be acquainted with the subject. MezzoMezzo (talk) 07:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Quad chart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130330062910/http://www.science.mod.uk:80/engagement/cde/quad_charts.aspx to http://www.science.mod.uk/engagement/cde/quad_charts.aspx
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.gao.gov/cbi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-927 - Added
{{dead link}}tag to https://www.dtrasubmission.net/help/quadchart.asp - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.science.mod.uk/Engagement/CDE/temp/quad_charts.aspx - Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130301233417/http://www.public.navy.mil/necc/hq/Documents/NECC_N9_QuadChart.ppt to http://www.public.navy.mil/necc/hq/Documents/NECC_N9_QuadChart.ppt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)