Talk:Quantum finance

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too technical?[edit]

I've added the 'Technical' tag as I thought this article assumes too much prior knowledge for a general audience. It reads a little like an academic literature review - is this its origin? I wonder whether using more real-world examples, and fleshing out the lede, might make it easier for a general reader to get into the article? Docben (talk) 22:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?[edit]

Someone appears to have conflated these pricing computations with some Q Anon "Quantum Financial System" nonsense. The introduction paragraph may now be misleading. I don't have the knowledge to correct the intro paragraph or the ability to restore the previous article. Just wanted to call attention to whoever may be able to address this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.95.242 (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted section "Instrument pricing"[edit]

The section "Instrument pricing" has one reference completely unrelated to "quantum finance", it's just a claim about quantum computing. The rest of the section amounts to "gee if quantum computing works out it would be great for financial computing". It's WP:OR and off topic anyway. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]