Talk:Quickhull

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Higher dimensions[edit]

Is there a 3d version? Thanks. 92.30.31.79 (talk) 13:23, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to the convex hull algorithms page Quickhull can be used to solve dimensions higher than 3 (I assume that it can be used to solve for 3D as well). However, this article does not include an algorithm for higher than 2D and even says it is used to compute the "convex hull of a finite set of points in the plane". Does anyone know if/how Quickhull can be used for problems with higher dimensions than 2D? Nathan Wonnacott (talk) 17:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

The statement "Its worst case complexity for 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional space is considered to be " does not seem to be right. It can be for some configurations of points when the majority of points are left in one subset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.248.120.198 (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]