Talk:RGraph

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 January 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RGraph article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 8 January 2020 with the comment:
Some mentions in passing but not seeing any reliable review that's in-depth. Seems to fail WP:NSOFTWARE.
It was contested by Avbgok (talk · contribs) on 2020-01-09 with the comment:
deprodded according to wp:deprod

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

JavaScript Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject JavaScript, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to JavaScript, and to the development of user scripts for use on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaScriptWikipedia:WikiProject JavaScriptTemplate:WikiProject JavaScriptJavaScript articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Does code...[edit]

belong in the article? Perhaps discuss here and reach consensus. David notMD (talk) 11:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI edits[edit]

I want to pay attention of other editors that a lot of significant edits including the addition of the code mentioned above have been made lately by user with WP:COI (acknowledged). At first glance those edits look really promotional adding excessive details. Opinions and efforts on how to best work on this article then are welcomed. Thank you. Avbgok (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've made edits and removed what I think is "promotional". Which bits do you question? Is there something else that you want me to do to the article? Revert it to what it was before I started editing it? I do like the box on the right-hand-side though. Plus I don't know what is meant by "needs citation" I've removed a few more bits - does it now fit with Wikipedia standards?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard heyes (talk • contribs) 20:09, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion[edit]

Why is this article going to be deleted? I've removed anything that could be considered "promotional". Richard heyes (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been proposed for deletion by an editor named Piotrus. You can see the reason why this was done by looking at the "Proposed deletion" template added to the top of the article. If you or anyone disagrees with this assessment, you can WP:DEPROD the article. (Ideally, though it would be better if someone other than yourself did so, but you can deprod it.) If anyone disagrees with the de-prodding, they can then nominate the article for deletion at WP:AFD where a more formal discussion will take place to discuss the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have deprodded it according to WP:DEPROD as I consider this article passing WP:NSOFT and anyway we should remember about WP:CONTN. Informed Piotrus on their user talk page. Avbgok (talk) 08:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]