Talk:RIM-174 Standard ERAM

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

SM-6 ERAM has a designation now[edit]

The SM-6 has been designated RIM-174. I will try to confirm this from a second source.--Two way time (talk) 02:05, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Australia?[edit]

Please verify, quote a source to prove Australia is involved in development of this missile, and will buy this missile. 74.214.44.131 (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ship attack[edit]

http://breakingdefense.com/2015/08/pit-lrasm-against-tomahawk-for-anti-ship-missile-vadm-aucoin/?sf11722332=1

Is the proposed ship attack mode notable yet? Hcobb (talk) 23:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are the fastest anti-ship missiles that the ERAM is capable of taking out?[edit]

There's no specific information in this article regarding the fastest anti-ship missiles that the RIM-174 Standard ERAM is capable of taking out. Can it take out the fastest supersonic anti-ship missiles or hypersonic missiles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.146.53.89 (talk) 22:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How did the USS Reuben James sink?[edit]

 list of shipwrecks in 2016 and SM-6 say that it was sunk by a new variant of the SM-6 missile.  BUT the section USS Reuben James (FFG-57)#Final disposition says that the SM-6 test successfully hit and significantly damaged the James, but did NOT sink it.  That section claims it took significant further actions by other means (including the use of scuttling charges installed before the test began)  I found no references that justify this claim, so I do not know the real story here.
 All three pages (USS Reuben James, SM-6, and shipwrecks of 2016) site the same reference, but it is advertising the success of the missile test and does not specifically say the missile sank the ship.

2600:8801:8500:EC8:8D86:3408:9796:D6FD (talk) 01:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 OTH Launch Test[edit]

In April, 2021, the USS John Finn performed an over-the-horizon (OTH) missile launch of an SM-6 without using its active sensors. link — MrDolomite • Talk 00:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new article[edit]

The Army intends to use the SM-6 for its SMRF program. I'm attempting to create a draft here: User:AN0M4L1Y/Strategic Mid-Range Fires AN0M4L1Y (talk) 00:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]