Talk:Raghaveshwara Bharathi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raghaveshwara Bharathi article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Karnataka Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in September 2012.

References[edit]

we are all struggling to make this as a good article. So all may kindly contribute by sharing any trusted source or reference. I found good references for Viswa Mangala Gou Grama Yatra but not much for Viswa Gou Sammelana. This is probably because it is published in Kannada news papers and kannada news papers do not maintain archive(which we can search) online. Please contribute more references or post it here in the talk section. --Bharathiya (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of contents/ vandalism[edit]

This article has been subject to constant vandalism attempts. Anybody having anything to say/object can do so in this talk page and they will be duly answered/solved. However please refrain yourself from removing any content from the article without reaching the broad consensus according to wiki policy.

Note: As far as the Controversy section is concerned. We can't help, since the contents are true and is having multiple and reputable sources (confirms WP:RS). At present, the contents are also facts but are indeed neutral as per wiki policy. It does not intend to hurt or to talk bad about anybody.

Thanks. -- Bharathiya (talk) 05:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not write whatever[edit]

This page is being concidered for deletion because a lot of people wrote meaning less things not acceptable to Wiki standards. Please do not praise the Guruji. Just try to add information and provide souces as required. Adding unsouced information will get this article deleted. Please help. ~rAGU (talk)

www.hareraama.in —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhirama.hegde (talk • contribs) 14:28, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXCEPTIONAL[edit]

The second para of the article needs moderation, shortened and removal of sensitive matters, as per WP:EXCEPTIONAL. I request other editors to discuss this.-Rayabhari (talk) 04:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now it seems to be better. Yes, I agree with you. I think it just needs to be presented in a proper manner with careful wording rather than removal. Further, yes, We have to maintain neutrality in all aspects especially in Wiki. Thanks. -- Bharathiya (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advaita Vedanta vs Advait Mat[edit]

Raghaveshwara is a follower and teacher of Advaita Vedānta, a leading school of Indian philosophy propounded by Acarya Sankara, as were and are numerous members of the Dasanami Sampradaya and all Jagadguru Sankaracaryas. However, Raghaveshwara is not a guru of "Advait Mat," a lineage of teachers originating from "First Guru" Advaitanand. Hence, placing Raghaveshwara in the Category "Advait Mat gurus" is a mistake.Oliver Puertogallera (talk) 00:14, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of rape allegations section without editor consensus[edit]

I have noticed some editors removing the section about rape allegations, a section I understand to be well-sourced and supported by the majority of external media.

There isn't consensus from the other editors on this. Teb (talk) 19:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"The 15 judges have recused in various cases"[edit]

Who are these 15 judges? Why is it necessary to add "the" at the beginning? Kpbolumbu (talk) 19:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Notable disciples"[edit]

Mr. Nalin Kumar Kateel is represented as a notable disciple of Swamiji. What is the basis for this act of the author of the section mentioned above. Kpbolumbu (talk) 19:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]