Talk:Raigad district

India: Districts / Maharashtra / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Maharashtra may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Raigarh district?[edit]

I was redirected to this page from Raigarh district. Is this supposed to happen? Paul Haymon 22:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. The 2011 census atlas gives the name of the district as Raigarh. Perhaps an explanation of the two names might be useful. Skinsmoke (talk) 10:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Raigad?[edit]

Why dos this page contain only history of Raigad District —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12syd (talk • contribs) 11:11, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

references[edit]

i put in the reference tags, however some of the refences use abbreviations. to whoever wrote the original text, please compile a list of the full titles used in the article an insert them at the end under literature. thanks.--87.171.92.204 (talk) 17:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Raigad district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]