Talk:Rana Punja

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 January 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: Rajasthan / History Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 09:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 November 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No prejudice against a new RM discussing the merits of IIO's proposed title, Rana Punja. Jenks24 (talk) 14:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rao Poonja → Punja – spelling as per source -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 08:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose no evidence the 1576 battle Punja/Poonja is the only subject (and this article really needs better sources). I have created a baseline dab, and the dab could equally be at Poonja; in any case there's no primary here. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NB This article might be better at Rana Punja:

Rana Punja was a successful ruler, establishing several claims over the neighbouring lands. He left three sons, Mansing who succeeded him, Amarsing who received the village of Sudasna, and Dhengoji who was given Gancheru.

That's what most sources call him In ictu oculi (talk) 19:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

oppose I see no reason to delete the page at "Punja" and merge it into a hatnote here -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Intention to revive this article[edit]

I have reviewed prior discussions related to the deletion/redirection of this article and have taken into account the concerns of those advocating deletion/redirection as well as those editors who thought this article could properly be sourced. In the totality of prior reasoning, I feel it is worth a shot to revive the article and source it properly, and will be attempting to do so over the summer of 2019. Comments welcome.Deccantrap (talk) 20:09, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]