Talk:Ranakpur

India: Rajasthan Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Jainism Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Manual of Style – Naming conventionsJainismWikipedia:WikiProject JainismTemplate:WikiProject JainismJainism articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 09:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ranakpur Village?[edit]

I think there is really no Ranakpur village, just the temple complex. It is in the middle of nowhere.

Malaiya (talk) 20:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant and broken links[edit]

Under references, Godwar link is present but that's a broken link and should be removed.

History quester (talk) 13:49, 29 December 2021 (UTC) (talk • contribs) 13:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]