Talk:Rand formula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Liamthomas99.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Limited geographic scope[edit]

I don't think this article has a limited geographic scope because the Rand Formula is only supposed to be about Canada. It is not pretending to represent the entire world of labour laws, only Canada's. Martin-C (talk) 03:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plan to add section, Reception[edit]

The Rand Formula has been implemented in a variety of legal contexts and although interpreted by its critics as binding businesses to violate the free choice of their employees[1], and as having a negative effect in that it limits individual choice on whether or not to pay union dues in a manner incompatible with market economies it has been generally well received.[2] The positive reception of the Rand formula came mostly from unions and their allies[3] with conservative Canadians voicing the most opposition[4] . The rationale for the Rand formula being stated as “unions are service providers entitled to appropriate compensation for the services they provide”[5] demonstrating that the Rand formula was viewed by the judiciary as a reasonable limit on personal economic freedom in a free market economy such as Canada's. The Formula was largely perceived by businesses and individuals in Canada as a compromise between the extremes of mandatory union membership and universal non-unionism[6]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bidmap (talkcontribs) 06:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References