Talk:Rans S-4 Coyote

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rans S-4 Coyote article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Landing gear configuration[edit]

An IP editor added that the S-4 was tail wheel equipped and the S-5 was tricycle gear equipped, without citing any refs. I have removed this because the ref that I have that discussed the S-4/S-5, Purdy says "Trike and taildragger options", indicting that both models were available with both landing gear configurations. Unless a reliable ref can be cited that shows Purdy to be wrong then this is the best information we have. - Ahunt (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I found a company ref which sorts this out, added. - Ahunt (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]