Talk:Ratchet & Clank: Size Matters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

US Release Date[edit]

The article lists March 6th, 2007 as the release date, but I can't find any site that verifies this. EB Games says 2/27, but those dates are always just guesses. All the "official" stuff from Sony or the developers has always said "Q1 2007" - unless I'm missing something? TheMaster42 04:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Still can't find any source for the March release date. So I've changed it to the "official" ambiguity. TheMaster42 08:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


What are you talking about? The US release date was February 14, where are you getting march from?

Size Does Matter[edit]

Someone changed the infobox title to "Size Does Matter". I'm pretty sure this is incorrect, as the vast majority of reviews list the game as "Size Matters": http://www.google.com/search?q=ratchet+and+clank+size+does+matter&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

TheMaster42 05:57, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean this will be the first handheld game on the PSP? They have smart moves...., but we may have to wait for this game to arrive. Best Gamer

Special Agent Clank[edit]

The article currently contains a link to this page: [1], which mentions the title is called "Special Agent Clank". However, the GameSpot article doesn't indicate the game will be themed this way at all. I'm guessing the "rumor" article is incorrect... should the link be removed?

Probably. I was unsure so I left it there for now. Thunderbrand 21:32, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First non-Insomniac R&C game?[edit]

It's not the first R&C game not made by Insomniac - Going Mobile has been out for months and that wasn't made by Insomniac. I'd fix it, but I'm not particulary good at writing this stuff. --DK 03:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Release Date Error?[edit]

I noticed on the page, Ratchet & Clank (series), It says the release date is February 14, but on the main article, it says it was February 13. Is their a reason for this?



Synopsis[edit]

Some, y'know, spoiler warnings would be nice.

None of what's in there, presently, is spoiler material; that's pretty much the boilerplate story that the game sites had prior to release. --Masem 16:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We should still keep it up though, just in case someone decides to add information about the synopsis other than what has been given by the gaming sites. :^) §†SupaSoldier†§ 16:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons[edit]

I played this for about 40 minutes yesterday at a Sony locker room challenge & noticed that neither the shrink ray or that watering gun (sorry, don't remember the exact name) aren't listed...? 64.241.230.3 15:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The game includes both "weapons" and "gadgets" in the menus. The wiki page does not currently include any of the gadgets --James 16:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indecent tone[edit]

The article is written in an indecent tone expected from an encyclopedic article. I advice a full re-writing of it until it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.167.234.84 (talk) 23:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Mistakes[edit]

There are quite a few plot mistakes in there. There was no "life sucker" or anyone named Kran. Amamamp (talk) 00:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC) ==Cover== Theres a cover uploaded here someone put it on the infobox, please. I can not.[reply]

Spin-Off?[edit]

The events of the game are never mentioned in the Future trilogy (in contrast to the first four), which is part of the main series, and Insomniac had nothing to do with the game. Plus the wiki refers to it as a spin-off, anyway. Should we list this game as a spin-off? 1.123.62.111 (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Quality[edit]

I have added a rewrite tag to the article. Frankly, the quality of writing is horrible. The prose is poor and there are spelling mistakes throughout. Though the content seems at least accurate, the article will probably need to be redone from scratch. R0uge (talk) 21:48, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ratchet & Clank: Size Matters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ratchet_%26_Clank:_Size_Matters&oldid=1202391243"