Talk:Ravenna Cosmography
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ravenna Cosmography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110208190533/http://www.roman-britain.org/frontiers/hw_ravenna.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/frontiers/hw_ravenna.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Unreferenced text[edit]
I have removed the following:
- The three manuscript copies are distanced from the autograph (original manuscript) by three or four generations. As a result, the copies are plagued by errors of spelling, word division, omission, and even errors of hearing. (The text was apparently dictated at one point.) The text-to-text variations are not limited to the place-names, but are also significant in the intervening commentary. Thus, the bulk of the blame cannot be placed on the original author.
Most of it appears to be a direct copy from the AbeBooks website, but it is unclear if it is correct. "Three or four generations" should surely be "5 or 6 centuries", since it was written in the early 8th century and the manuscripts date from the 13th and 14th centuries. Recent scholarly studies suggest that the author was responsible for many of the difficulties. Feel free to challenge this if you have good sources. Bob1960evens (talk) 15:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)