Talk:Ray Bradbury/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 11:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
An immediate fail, I'm afraid. The rash of justified "citation needed" tags throughout the article says it all. There are still more uncited statements that have so far escaped the cn tag. The prose is not consistently encyclopaedic in tone, and some trivial information such as Bradbury's appearance on a quiz show, needs trimming, but there is quite a lot of good and interesting material in the article, and if adequately referenced it could be worth submitting for GAN, but at present it does not approach GA standard. Tim riley talk 11:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)