Talk:Raygun Gothic

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

"Planet of the Vampires"[edit]

Would Mario Bava's Planet of the Vampires be included as one within this section? It has been described as being "gothic science-fiction". DrWho42 06:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Link to copyrighted material?[edit]

Namely the link to the Gibson text. It's an RU domain, which always looks iffy to me. [Three minutes and one Google later:] There's an apparently legit copy of "The Gernsback Continuum" here: [[1]] RLetson 01:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warhammer 40,000[edit]

Is the Warhammer 40,000 an example of this? Wouter Lievens 12:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Fallout" as Raygun Gothic?[edit]

I'm not terribly sure about this being listed as an example of the genre. I haven't played the game myself, so I don't know from experience, but every image and video capture I've seen suggests this is an industrial-themed game, or perhaps dieselpunk at a stretch. What makes it a raygun gothic piece? Sinnyo (talk) 12:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Raygun Gothic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071108214635/http://paradoxa.com/excerpts/4-11intro.htm to http://paradoxa.com/excerpts/4-11intro.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]