Talk:Raymond Sackler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Raymond Sackler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What a ridiculous promotional article this is.[edit]

Here is a guy who made $14 billion pedaling the drug that has singlehandedly caused the most damage to American society, and yet we're treated to his hagiography? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.241.45 (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Has Wikipedia fallen victim to “reputation laundering”?[edit]

Quoting The Guardian:

What some call philanthropy, others, such as Stanford University ethics professor Rob Reich, call “reputation laundering”.

Reviewing this article is seems Wikipedia fallen victim to this effort?

Bjornte (talk) 05:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Philanthropy section[edit]

The Philanthropy section is full of reference to uncited philanthropic actions, in fact, the only cited content here is about the rejection of Sackler philanthropy. Should this section be trimmed or ammended? Generally, I'd propose removing all unsourced information. I don't see a good reason to keep it on, unless there are solid WP:RS about previous philanthropy. SiliconRed (talk) 14:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]