This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Support: Seems like a reasonable assumption that most people will be looking for information about the email notation. –CWenger (^ • @) 20:17, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. A more consistent name for the article would be Re: (band). The (band) is a long held disambiguator for article names. I'll support a move to Re: (band). Argolin (talk) 23:22, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would modifying the hatnote on this article to include a direct link to RE (e-mail) be a workable compromise? PowersT 14:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, since the music thing is not the topic that should reside at this name, the email topic is, moving the email article here would be ok though. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 07:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not really as "re:" is used in communications such as letters - you know, using a pen/printer and paper? for all of you under the age of 25, the common usage of re; is not emails as they are not the only form of written communications.
I would love to see someone try and prove that though, imagine counting all the letters and emails sent all over the world in the last year that had re: in them just to show that there were more in emails...cu in 5yrs sukr lol Chaosdruid (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, it's not this music thing. Do we have an article on memos using "re:"? 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
