Talk:Rebus/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

CopyVio

It looks like most of this page was plagiarised from the definition of "rebus" on www.answers.com.

I believe that [answers.com] is (among other things?) a mirror of Wikipedia, so the definition there will have legitimately come from this site. --JimmyTheWig 12:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)


Also all these supposed "rules" for interpreting rebuses are actually counter to the spirit of a rebus. Normally a rebus is a violation of the normal rules governing language - to introduce a set of rules by which a rebus could be interpreted is exactly to eliminate the vital characteristic of a rebus. STUPID . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.243.12 (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Cant see

According to the Wikipedia article, This Old Man is a rebus. I can't see how, myself.

Is there something about a rebus that this article is missing?

--JimmyTheWig 16:57, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

I also can't see how earth + nurse = athens. Thats just not a rebus in english please remove. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.243.12 (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Doubt

"Nowadays, rebus puzzles are used as brainteasers and placed in IQ tests."

I doubt that. What IQ test bears rebus puzzles? None of the clinically recognized ones that I know of. So please cite a clinically recognized IQ test as an example in the article or get rid of the "and placed in IQ tests" part.

Not

By the definition given in the first part of the article, the I (heart) NY logo and the example puzzles are not rebuses. These examples are simply false and should be removed. Mrrhum 04:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. I (heart) New York simply uses a symbol in place of a word, and the puzzles are just word teasers. I'm going to remove that section. JesterXXV 18:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Arms-congleton.jpg

Image:Arms-congleton.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Page being used for personal promotion

Airvegny, twice now you've tried to put your own examples of "rebuses" on this page, puzzles directly from your website that use come convoluted letter-deletion and letter-swapping code to change the name of a picture into the name of a city. These aren't rebuses - rebuses involve at most dropping letters from images, not rearranging the letters in the word representing the image. If you can show a source from something other than your website that demonstrates this as a rebus, then that would be better, but even if you did, including more than a single example is unencyclopedic - Wikipedia isn't for logic puzzles, and there's no reason to have an entire section of them as what you outright said was meant as a game for the readers. --Idran (talk) 03:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

  • You mistake. This is real rebuses. See exapmles and evidence. Google [1], Other encyclopedies [2]
  • None of the Google images from that link you provided have the apostrophe scheme, as far as I can see. I don't think that such a minor subtype of rebuses fits the article, much less multiple examples of such, when the article itself is very succinct. Removing them isn't vandalism in any way. Capntastic (talk) 07:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Regardless, the examples provided add nothing but length to the article. A single example is more than adequete. Angrysockhop (talk to me) 06:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Sk8, B&, 4play and so on

Why is there no mention of such usages? Those are rebuses, no? --TiagoTiago (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2010 (UTC) And how about I.O.U. and tax form 1040-EZ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.225.17.141 (talk) 05:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Add a section on Rebus Stories: rebuses are not just puzzles

The most mainstream meaning of rebus that I've always been familiar with is their use as a pedagogical aid: for example kid's books where pictures of words are placed above the words or instead of words. They aren't designed to 'trick' people or be puzzles. They are especially helpful for folks learning a new language. Perhaps distinguish them by calling them 'rebus stories' and the other type 'rebus puzzles'. Here are just a few sites illustrating examples and uses of rebus stories:

Rewrite, Please

Someone needs to rewrite this article in English, using English spelling, syntax, grammar, and punctuation. rowley (talk) 21:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rebus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:35, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Gramograms

I've just stub-sorted and expanded Gramogram (aka Grammagram or Letteral word), which seems to be a specialised form of rebus - something like CU or FUNEX, where pronouncing the letters gives a meaning. Comments, contributions, or a reliable source for the name of these things (quite possibly not the one being used in the article, but I can't find anything else) welcome! PamD 11:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rebus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rebus/Archive_1&oldid=1137117201"