Talk:Record sealing

Untitled[edit]

The article cited clearly states that the "content may be distributed free of charged and used in it entirety if properly cited."

I've removed the speedy notice for now. CloudNine 17:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

American Centric.[edit]

This article only seems to apply to American law. does it apply in other countries? if so, how and where? if not it should atleast state that it only applies in American law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.101.123 (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

The first three paragraphs of this article have been a copyright violation since the article was created in 2007. To the extent that it is not verbatim copying, it is close paraphrasing. This was correctly flagged almost immediately (and again in 2008). The grant of permission on the source website is neither a public domain dedication nor a free license sufficient for Wikipedia's purposes. Indeed, someone purporting to be the source article's creator re-added the reference, saying: "References copyrighted material".

Incidentally, the original creation of the article was probably part of a refspam operation. 15 years of free advertising; not bad!

I have removed the first three paragraphs. I have added a one-sentence description of my own devising so that the article isn't left in a state where it doesn't describe its subject, but someone should expand it with sources. —Emufarmers^(T/C) 23:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]