Talk:Red Hacker Alliance

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

{{WikiProject China}help me}

New Stuff[edit]

I have added all I can for this article for now. Any contributions would be welcome. --Sharkface^T/_C 04:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Honker Union[edit]

~~I believe this article should be merged into Honker Union because I believe both article covers the same group:~~

~~a) In Chinese, it is exactly the same name. Honker = Red Hacker, Alliance = Union;~~

~~b) Lion is the leader of both group according to [1] and [2].~~

~~c) According to Xinhua, Red Hacker Allience is formed in 2000. That is around the same time frame as Honker Union creation. Also both group carries out nationalist attack against US.~~

~~Thus, In my conclusion Red Hacker Alliance is Honker Union. Jim101 (talk) 02:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)~~[reply]

Wrong info. no merge. Jim101 (talk) 03:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]