Talk:Relativistic particle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

rm of "Oh my god particle"[edit]

Really, I don't think that it is INTRINSICALLY related to the direction this particle should be going, so it's also a means of trimming down the list as it's quite large now. There are links, but I think that it's a better idea to make sure this article is maintained to stop the list from just ending up as a huge list of particles which are specified or work noticeably within the confines of special or general relativity or implications thereof. The page redirected, and it was just a bad idea for an addition. Uxorion 19:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Relativistic particle/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Luqmaanmm 15:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree on the whole article because it goes against the basic principle of physics. I am preparing new article to replace this one. I challenge the author and physicists to debate on this concept.

Luqmaanmm 15:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)