Talk:Religious views on same-sex marriage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How does it relate to the persecution of Christians?[edit]

Some Christians not in favour of same-sex marriage seem to name the suffering Church as a counterargument. For example, Justin Welby, the Archbishop-designate of Canterbury said in his opening statement: "We also face deep differences over the issue of sexuality. It is absolutely right for the state to define the rights and status of people co-habiting in different forms of relationships, including civil partnerships. We must have no truck with any form of homophobia, in any part of the church. The Church of England is part of the worldwide church, with all the responsibilities that come from those links. What the church does here deeply affects the already greatly suffering churches in places like northern Nigeria, which I know well. I support the House of Bishop's statement in the summer in answer to the government's consultation on same sex marriage. I know I need to listen very attentively to the LGBT communities, and examine my own thinking prayerfully and carefully. I am always averse to the language of exclusion, when what we are called to is to love in the same way as Jesus Christ loves us. Above all in the church we need to create safe spaces for these issues to be discussed honestly and in love." (Emphasis added.)

Can someone explain the line of argument that links the two, please? – Kaihsu (talk) 06:08, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have questions, try the Wikipedia:Reference desk. Talk pages are for discussing what the content of an article should be, not for answering questions - particularly on contentious issues. Thanks.--Scott Mac 15:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try there. – Kaihsu (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Query now resolved.Kaihsu (talk) 09:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Catholicism[edit]

The section on Catholic Church opposition is poorly written. There are several factual omissions about reasons for opposition, the most prominent being the doctrine about procreative aspects of marriage. This doctrine can be verified within several official Vatican documents, such as the Catechism of the Catholic Church, under the fecundity of marriage.24.212.151.213 (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Put in Neutral / Mixed ?[edit]

Should there be a section for neutral or 'neither' ? I realize there's a tendency to polarize or state things as if polarized, but read examples like New Zealand Presbyterian position seems more will-comply-with-local-law rather than either really supporting or opposing. Markbassett (talk) 16:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It might be better to list by religion, rather than pro and con. Opinions? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 12:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Massive North American bias[edit]

The article has little information about the views of religious groups outside the North American region, but intricate detail about many minority religions. I've added the Globalize tag. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Religious views on same-sex marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 8 external links on Religious views on same-sex marriage. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

English[edit]

Whats are christian views on same sex marriage 41.114.236.121 (talk) 17:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]