Talk:Res extensa

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Modern philosophy

Propose move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Res Extensa → Res extensa — -- Proper title format.Greg Bard (talk) 22:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Res extensa/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

0MG can't believe I just wrote all that on Descartes - the IBO has had me! Aaaaaaaaaargh!

Last edited at 21:50, 23 July 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 20:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC) erefefeeteet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.44.235.154 (talk) 01:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]