This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
So, aside from a less dumb name, how is this different from Brain_gain?
69.86.189.171 (talk) 07:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To my understand, it emphasis more on... well... the 'reverse' flow of 'brain drain' which is always defined as from the more developed country to a less developed country. Daerbregnig (talk) 07:36, 13 October 2010(UTC)
Btw, the article is good, but some section needs more proof-reading. For example: "Besides the government policies and economic reasons for returning back to China, certain family factors influenced the decision to return, some of the reasons where parental views about returning, concerns for children, and the attitude of one’s spouse about returning"... was not clear Daerbregnig (talk) 07:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
