Talk:RichFaces

Untitled

This capitalisation matches the product name, and so ought to be used for the canonical form of the article. Alternatively JBoss RichFaces, which incorporates the project name. However RichFaces has had a chequered history and name changes in the past, so I'd favour RichFaces as overall best. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I believe the MOS tells us to avoid breaking the rules of English grammar just to appease someone's clever trademark. So oppose on that basis. --Narson ~ Talk • 00:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

What does English suggest though? WP:Manual of Style (trademarks) tells us, "editors should choose among styles already in use (not invent new ones) and choose the style that most closely resembles standard English," Now this produt name (not AFAIK a trademark) is the concatenation of two words "Rich" and "Faces" into "RichFaces", rather an an out and out neologism as "Richfaces". On that basis, I'd see standard English as not having a strong inclination either way and favouring "RichFaces" if anything. We have no wiki-technical reason to favour either one either (i.e. no "iTunes" problem). Clearly we need redirs for both, so it's only a question of which becomes canonical. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

+1 for changing the page name to RichFaces. That's what the product is called after all, whether anyone likes it or not. Ammaletu (talk) 14:39, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

Richfaces → RichFaces — I think this article should retitled. RichFaces instead of Richfaces. To be consistent with the rest of the article. I tried to do it using Move, but it did not succeed. —Mortense (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

• Comment: This would also make it consistent with the title of the JavaServer Faces article. I also note that Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks)#General rules reads in part Trademarks in CamelCase are a judgment call. CamelCase may be used where it reflects general usage and makes the trademark more readable: OxyContin or Oxycontin — editor's choice, which seems to support the use of CamelCase here. Andrewa (talk) 06:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

 Moved. Jafeluv (talk) 12:46, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Sounds like an ad

RichFaces is more than just a component library for JavaServer Faces. It adds:

sounds like an ad. I'm not saying it is an ad, but it does sound like one, so it should be re-written. --Lo'oris (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on RichFaces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090202144946/http://www.jsfone.com:80/blog/max_katz/2008/08/ajax4jsf_and_richfaces__historical_perspective.html to http://www.jsfone.com/blog/max_katz/2008/08/ajax4jsf_and_richfaces__historical_perspective.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)