Talk:Richard Neville, 16th Earl of Warwick/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 16:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I have completed everything except for a review of the prose, which I will complete after I go get lunch :) So far, the article is looking great. I should have the review finished by mid-afternoon. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 16:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have now finished the review of the article, and as I have found no issues, I am promoting it to GA status. This is a wonderful article, very well written. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 18:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]