Talk:Rick Boyce
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 January 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Web Banner Relationship[edit]
Good reference on the web banner "fatherhood". I think there should be a more precise source for this nomination. Jettparmer (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Suggested Categorization[edit]
From the articles referenced, it seems Rick is more of a marketing / ad pioneer than a technical one. I originally interpreted his role as one of technical or creative development, rather than marketing, sales and adveretising. I suggest the article be categorized along such lines. The added references suggest Rick's role was as the person who convinced people that the banner ad was a viable outlet. Nice work. Jettparmer (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Relevance / Advert[edit]
I think there is some merit to revisit the value of this page. Mr. Boyce's impact on the internet appears to be relatively mundane. here are few significant references to him in the print or trade media. A google search for him reveals little of relevance and his own Rick Boycewebsite contains almost all of the text in this article - essenially violating WP:artspam Jettparmer (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)